Competition 2023
Competition: Collaboration/Education

Fast-kNN: A hardware implementation of a k-Nearest-Neighbours classifier for accelerated inference

Project Motivation and Goals

The k-Nearest-Neighbours (kNN) algorithm is a popular Machine Learning technique that can be used for a variety of supervised classification tasks. In contrast to other machine learning algorithms which "encode" the knowledge gained from training data to a set of parameters, such as weights and biases, the parameter set of a kNN classifier consists of just labelled training examples. Classification of an unlabelled example takes place by calculating its Euclidean distance (or any other type of distance metric) from all the stored training examples. The label of the unknown example is determined by the majority of the labels of the k closest examples.

In contrast to other Machine Learning methods, kNN classification doesn't require an explicit training phase, which makes it a potential candidate for learning directly from the data captured by an embedded system. However, the computation of the distance metrics between a new unclassified example and the labelled examples stored as the classifier's parameter set acts as a bottleneck in the classification process, if it is implemented in software. Through the development of dedicated hardware for calculating the required distance metrics, it is possible to reduce inference time.

The goal of this project is to build a hardware implementation of a kNN classifier that can achieve reduced inference time when compared to a kNN classifier implemented fully in software, through the parallelisation of distance metric computations. The project has an educational purpose and it expected that by its completion, the contributors will have gone through the complete design cycle of a SoC.

Design Specification

The first step in defining the design specification for the accelerator was to determine the type of data that need to be processed by it. The Fashion-MNIST dataset has been selected as the primary data source. Therefore, the accelerator should be able to handle grayscale image vectors with a size of 28 x 28 pixels. We assume that some of these images will be labelled (training set), while some of them won't (test set). The accelerator should help with computing the distance between all the labelled images and each unknown image in the unlabelled set.

Data to be processed: N 28 x 28 8-bit (grayscale) labelled image vectors and M unlabelled image vectors, stored in SRAM.

Training and Test Sets
Matrix A: Labelled images vectors, Matrix B: Unlabelled images vectors

Image vectors a(i), b(j) have D elements, where D = 28 x 28 = 784. Each element is represented as an 8-bit unsigned integer value. If N = 200 and M = 50, the total storage requirements for matrices A and B are:

N x 785 + M x 784 = 200 x 785 + 50 x 784 = 196,200 bytes, which is approximately equal to 192 kB. It is assumed that one byte of storage is required for storing every label. This is the reason why the number of labelled examples N is multiplied by 785 and not 784.

We would like to compute the Squared Euclidean distance between each pair of vectors a(i), b(j). This computation is given by the sum of 3 dot products, as shown below:

Squared Euclidean Distance
Squared Euclidean Distance

The self-dot products a(i)a(i) and b(j)b(j) can only be computed once and then reused for another computation.

Design Rationale

Constraints introduced by the SoC infrastructure

The nanosoc infrastructure provided by SoCLabs was used as the core of the design. At the early design stages, it was decided not to use a DMA peripheral for writing/reading data to/from the accelerator engine to keep things simple. Therefore, all the data movements to/from the accelerator were happening through the AHB-Lite Bus.

 

Accelerator Dataflow

The accelerator's input data consist of high-dimensional image vectors. In contrast, its output data consist of just three scalar values. In addition, the rate at which data need to be written to the engine is much higher than the rate at which computed values need to be moved out. The above two observations indicate that the accelerator's dataflow is highly asymmetric. Writing a complete image vector to the accelerator engine instantaneously is not possible due to the bus constraints. However, computing the desired dot-products can happen incrementally, using parts of the image vectors delivered as packets.

The size of each input packet was set arbitrarily to 128 bits (16 bytes). An image vector with 784 byte long elements, can be split into 784 / 16 = 49 packets. The AHB-Lite Bus can deliver a 32-bit data word, which means that 4 write operations are required to create a packet of 128 bits.

 

I/O Ports

Input port:

  • 128-bit Valid/Ready signal port

Output port:

  • Register interface for reading the contents of the dot product accumulators and monitoring internal control/status registers.

 

System overview

To properly interface the Fast-kNN engine with the AHB-Lite bus, the accelerator wrapper IP provided by SoCLabs was used. Data words delivered through the AHB-Lite bus are passed to the AHB Packet Constructor which packages them into 128-bit packets. These packets are then passed to the engine though a valid-ready handshake. Reading the accumulator registers that hold the results of the computation required the use of the AHB Register Interface IP.

 

Accelerator Wrapper
Accelerator wrapper for interfacing with the AHB-Lite Bus

 

Fast-kNN Engine

The Fast-kNN accelerator consists of the following parts:

  • A byte long buffer with a depth of 784 elements, whose purpose is to store a complete unlabelled image vector.
  • A byte long buffer with a depth of 16 elements that temporarily holds a data packet from a labelled image.
  • Three 32-bit accumulator registers that hold the computed dot products. The contents of these registers are updated incrementally as new data packets become available.
  • A 3-bit control register, where each bit has the following role:
    • Bit 0 - Packet data ready flag. This flag is pulled low when the transfer of the input data packet from the packet constructor to the engine is complete and the dot product computation can begin.
    • Bit 1 - Priming mode flag. This flag is pulled low when the unlabelled image buffer becomes full.
    • Bit 2 - Software reset bit

 

Fast-kNN Engine Overview
Fast-kNN Engine Overview

 

After a reset, all data registers are empty and the priming mode flag is high. Delivered packets are written to the unlabelled image buffer and the self-dot product for the unlabelled image is incrementally accumulated. When a complete unlabelled image vector has been written to the engine, the priming mode flag is pulled low. Packets from a labelled image can then be delivered to the engine for the computation of the other two dot products to take place. Once all elements of the labelled image vector have been delivered to the engine, the accumulated values can be read through the AHB register interface. The same process is repeated for all labelled images. Before writing a new labelled image to the engine,  all the data registers need to be cleared and the priming mode flag needs to be pulled high.

Backend Flow

Accelerator Synthesis

Synthesis was run using Cadence Genus, using the scripts provided by SoClabs. The final accelerator area using a packet width of 128 was 139,000 µm2. Whilst running synthesis it was found that there was an unsynthesisable construct in the main accelerator engine, which was due to an incorrect definition of an asynchronous reset. This was fixed by ensuring the reset was in the sensitivity list of the always block and an if/else statement was used for the reset case.

Floor Planning

The relative placement of the accelerator to the rest of the SoC required partitioning the die into two power domains, one for the SoC and one for the accelerator, allowing for direct external measurement of the power used by the accelerator. The percentage of the entire ASIC tacken up by the accelerator was about 18%, this was mostly due to the large number of registers used within the accelerator. 

ASIC Floorplan

Tapeout

The final GDS design has been sent off for fabrication. The final specs for the design are:

  • Max clock frequency: 240 MHz
  • Accelerator Power consumption (20% activity): 55.1 mW
  • Total SoC Power consumption (20% activity): 146.5 mW
  • Leakage Power: 39 µW
  • Internal Memory: 48 kB (16 kB Instruction and Data memory + 2x 8 kB accelerator memory)
  • Supply voltage: 1.2 V
  • Interfaces: UART, FT1248, SWD
  • GPIO: 8 pins x 2 ports

Project Milestones

  1. First abstract description of project goals

    Target Date

    Rough outline of the project's goals, hardware accelerator idea and motivation.

  2. Architectural description and Familirisation with design tools

    Target Date

    - Specify the number format used for the arithmetic operations of the accelerator (i.e. 8-bit unsigned integers for grayscale images).

    - Select the distance metric used for kNN classification (i.e. Euclidean distances).

    - Determine the type of building blocks (i.e. adders, multipliers) required to perform the arithmetic operations.

    - Capture the architectural design in block diagram format, specifying the necessary inputs, outputs, registers and the overall data flow.

    - Complete the lab exercises from the "Introduction to SoC design" course to gain familiarity with Xilinx Vivado.

  3. Initial RTL Implementation

    Target Date
    Completed Date

    Familirisation with SoCLabs Accelerator Wrapper IP 

    Implementation of Packet constructor wrapper for writing 128-bit dat packets to the device

  4. Implementation of AHB Register interface

    Target Date

    Create register interface for reading the contents of accumulator registers

  5. Addition of DMA peripheral

    Target Date
  6. Software tests

    Target Date

    Implement software tests to check the accelerator's functionality at extreme cases.

  7. Final RTL submission

    Target Date
    Completed Date

    Submit the final design, integrated with nanoSoC for backend flow

  8. Synthesis

    Design Flow
    Target Date
    Completed Date

    Run synthesis and formal equivalence checks

  9. Floor Planning

    Design Flow
    Target Date
    Completed Date
  10. Clock Tree Synthesis

    Target Date
    Completed Date

    Clock tree synthesis and timing optimisation

  11. Timing closure

    Design Flow
    Target Date
    Completed Date
  12. DRC

    Target Date
    Completed Date

    Check DRC and fix any errors

  13. Tape Out

    Design Flow
    Target Date
    Completed Date

    Submit for tapeout to europractice TSMC 65nm mini ASIC shuttle

Team

Name
Research Area
Hardware Design
Role
student

Comments

Hi, I've been having some issues while trying to familiarise myself with the tools introduced by the labs of the Intro to SoC design course offered by Arm Education Media. The presented workflow introduces Xilinx Vivado and Arm Keil, both of which require a Windows environment (I think Vivado can also run on Linux). I am a Mac user and as a consequence I had trouble using the software. I have tried using the Soclabs servers, but the interface seems to become irresponsive sometimes. I have been told that this might be caused by a screensaver setting, but I still need to check.

Hopefully the advice on the local server has got you past that problem. Hopefully you can move on to the process of design. The process of design, like the design itself, can benefit from re-use. Design is a conceptual process and we often re-use techniques such as top down decomposition or bottom up. We can iterate between them to build out understanding. We can arm ourselves with questions that help rationalise the conceptual design.

In this case we have a known approach, k-Nearest-Neighbours (kNN) algorithm, and you have started to decompose this (top down). You also need to consider how you will calculate distances (bottom up). What is needed for each calculation and how does the SoC deliver that to allow the calculations to efficiently be undertaken. What are the limitations that are imposed by the SoC system and how best do we translate the mathematical algorithm onto it.  

In the example accelerator we show some custom logic for performing calculations. We have data moving across the bus of the SoC and into the accelerator and results coming back out. In your example how symmetric is the data needed versus the result and does that have any implications? What is the pattern of data flowing across the bus? Asking such questions helps develop our understanding of the design. Design is as much about generating questions as it is about generating answers. 

Perhaps you can share how you are developing your conceptual understanding of the Architectural Design space?

 

David and Daniel have added some items in the https://soclabs.org/design-flow/soc-design-contest-2023-example-flow that have some helpful questions such as can we at this stage identify and 'system bottlenecks'. Do other design decisions such as say the use of the 'reference design' constrain our design space, eg. how much data can we flow through the accelerator, what memory constrains/organisation. What area are we looking to deploy? How many calculations can we undertake in parallel? We can start to lay out questions and answers as part of conceptual understanding of a design.

It is good to see you working through the Architectural design phase and building the conceptual understanding of the design and design space for potential alternative designs.

It is interesting to consider the flow of 32-bit words over the bus into the accelerator and how these are structured compared to the original view for the labelled and unknown examples. How you can sequence the calculations and any intermediate results you can hold. Unlike the example SHA-2 accelerator that needs data aggregated from 32-bit words before it can undertake calculation in this case you may be able to undertake calculation more efficiently. 

Identifying both Data Patterns and Design Patterns can really help in the design phase. Look at how the data in structured in the calculations in relation to the labelled data set and unknown examples and how they interact and the implication on their storage in memory and flow across the SoC. That will help identify the Design Patterns for the IP blocks. 

Add new comment

To post a comment on this article, please log in to your account. New users can create an account.

Project Creator
Epifanios Baikas

PhD Student at University of Southampton
Research area: Machine Learning on Resource-Constrained Embedded Systems

Related Articles

Submitted on

Actions

Log-in to Join the Team